Interactive Effects of Controlled Drainage and Riparian Buffers on Shallow Groundwater Quality

Interactive Effects of Controlled Drainage and Riparian Buffers on Shallow Groundwater Quality

2003

As a result of recent surface water quality problems in North Carolina, riparian buffers and controlled drainage are being used to reduce the loss of nonpoint source nitrogen from agricultural fields. The effect of controlled drainage and riparian buffers as best management practices to reduce the loss of agricultural nonpoint source nitrogen from the middle coastal plain has not been well documented. The middle coastal plain is characterized by intensive agriculture on sandy soils with deeply incised or channelized streams. A 2-year study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of controlled drainage, riparian buffers, and a combination of both in the middle coastal plain of North Carolina. It was hypothesized that raising the water table near the ditch would enhance nitrate-nitrogen reduction through denitrification. On the sandy soils studied, controlled drainage did not effectively raise the water table near the ditch to a greater degree than observed on the free drainage treatment. Due to random treatment location, the free drainage treatment was installed along a ditch with a shallower impermeable layer compared to the impermeable layer on the controlled drainage treatments (2 m versus 3- to 4-m deep). This resulted in a perched or higher water table on the free drainage treatment. Over 17 storm events, the riparian buffer (free drainage) treatment had an average groundwater table depth of 0.92 m compared to 0.96 and 1.45 m for the combination (riparian buffer and controlled drainage) and controlled drainage treatments, respectively. Nitrate concentration decrease between the field wells and ditch edge wells averaged 29% (buffer only), 63% (buffer and controlled drainage), and 73% (controlled drainage only). Although apparently more nitrate was removed from the groundwater on the controlled drainage treatments, the controlled drainage treatment water table near the ditch was not raised closer to the ground surface compared to the free drainage treatment. Nitrate removal effectiveness was attributed to local soil and landscape properties, such as denitrification in deeper reduced zones of the soil profile.

Dukes, M. D.
Evans, Robert O.
Gilliam, J. W.
Kunickis, S. H.

Assistant Professor, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Dept., Univ. of Florida, 107 Frazier Rogers Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611
William Neal Reynolds Professor, Dept. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Williams Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695
Soil Scientist, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC 20250

11

Groundwater
Surface Water
Water Conveyance & Hydraulics
Water Policy

surface water
surface waters
surface-water
surface-waters
surfacewater
surfacewaters
riparian buffer
riparian buffers
riparian buffering
Best Management Practice
Best Management Practices
BMP
BMPs
B.M.P.
B.M.Ps
groundwater
ground water
ground-water
groundwaters
water supply
water supplies
water table
water tables
water-table
water-tables
groundwater quality
groundwater qualities
controlled drainage
CD
quality control
quality controls
water quality & pollutants
water quality and pollutants
water use & availability
water use and availbility
water usage and availability
water usage & availability
ground water - surface water interaction
ground water - surface water interactions
groundwater- surface water interaction
groundwater-surface water interactions
water supply manage
water supply management
water supply manages
water supply managing
shallow drainage

2000-2009

Yes

129(2)

Do Not Have Copyright Permission

Minnesota Water Research Digital Library