This letter to the editor rebuts flawed analyses made by O'Reilly (2014) and points out duplicative comments that have already been rebutted in the peer-reviewed literature. O'Reilly (2014) provides little new scientific information on the source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments, and the author stands by the results of her research.
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Springer US (New York, New York)
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Do Not Have Copyright Permission